Chambana Sun

Champaign County Racial Justice Task Force met June 29.

Here is the minutes as provided by the committee:

I. Call to Order

Ryan Hughes called the meeting to order at 6:42 pm.

II. Roll Call

Members Present: S. Balgoyen, L. Branham, E. Dee, A. Felty, R. Hughes, A. James, E. Patt, C.

Randolph, H. Ross, S. Silver, D. Turner, G. Walter.

Members Absent: M. Ar-Raheem, S. Byndom A. Evans, D. Harber, S. Lerner, A. Shelton.

III. Approval of Agenda

Sara Balgoyen moved to approve the minutes from the June 15 meeting. Gerry Walter seconded

the motion. The motion carried.

IV. Approval of Minutes

Esther Patt moved to approve the agenda. Artice James seconded the motion. The motion

carried.

V. Public Participation

Dave Sutton

It has come to his attention that the jail has a large number of people who have not been tried

presumably because they have not paid bail. He asked what the task force has done to reduce

fines and fees, or to eliminate cash bail. Lynn Branham responded saying that this is an issue that

has been considered by the task force. Some recommendations have been tentatively approved.

One is to expand the issuances of notices to appear at the jail in order to limit the number of

people entering the jail. The task force is also recommending pretrial services and risk

assessment for financial release conditions. She noted her appreciation for his support. Mr.

Sutton mentioned he is also in favor of bypassing the jail when possible. Carolyn Randolph

noted that she will not support race neutral policies but rather race-based policies.

VI. Presentations

There were no presentations at this meeting.

VII. Task Force Member Comments/Updates

Ryan noted that the task force was informed that the County Board approved an extension for 16

members of the task force. Sara read the names of the individuals who were appointed for the

extension:

Maryam Ar-Raheem

Sara Balgoyen

Lynn Branham

Sam Byndom

Ellyn Dee

Amy Felty

David Harber

Ryan Hughes

Artice James

Scott Lerner

Esther Patt

Carolyn Randolph

Henry Ross

Demario Turner

Susan Silver

Gerry Walter

Carolyn read the following statement:

It was recently brought to my attention that the Champaign County Board voted

to extend our tenure through October 2017.

Back in mid-March, we agreed to ask for an extension. The extension was never

requested, and as a result the entire RJTF reluctantly decided to accelerate our

timeline in an effort to complete our work by the original July 2017 deadline.

Now, it is clear that someone finally went to the Board to make a request for an

extension without discussing this with the rest of the RJTF. This breech of

communication and breakdown in leadership angers me. More important, it is

indicative of larger problems that exist within this body, problems that I and

others have mentioned on numerous occasions including a tendency to take over

and change the group agenda at the last minute; to make decisions without

consent and consensus from the entire group; to ignore select voices and/or

concerns; to talk around issues of race and racism despite being a racial justice

task force, to place the lion’s share of responsibility on the shoulders of a few

select group members, and so on.

Rather than dance around the subject and agree to spin our wheels for another

three months of service, I want the following questions to be answered:

1. Who requested this last-minute extension?

2. Why was the extension requested at this late date and not back in March as

agreed upon by the RJTF?

3. Why wasn’t this last-minute extension discussed with the entire board?

4. What specifically is going to be done during this extension?

5. What is going to be done differently, in terms of leadership, to ensure that we hit

our benchmarks?

Sara responded that her understanding that a request was made but it did not make it onto the

County Board until June. Sam Byndom may have more specific answers about the extension.

Esther and Sara shared their understanding of how the extension was requested. Artice agreed

that meeting the timeline for the final report created by the task force at the previous meeting is

the best thing to do. Gerry concurred and said that once all pieces are there for the final draft, the

task force can review what needs to happen to craft final report. Lynn noted that one reason for

the timeline agreed last time was for budget recommendations to the County Board. Lynn also

mentioned three items for all groups to consider for final report, including training and additional

issues to be addressed, CJTF coordinating council, and the need for data collection.

Subsection on Fines and Fees

Esther presented the draft section on fines and fees which has been updated. It is not uncommon

for court fees to exceed fines. Some people who do not have fines still have fees. Driving on a

suspended license seems to be a big issue. Amy asked about the protocol in recommendation 2.

Esther said that it would not require state changes. Gerry asked about mentioning “increasing

access to justice.” Gerry will draft some language about this. Lynn asked about the structure of

fees; she recommended that if there are any fees that are implemented because of local rules,

then the task force should recommend reducing those now (by the County Board). Esther

explained fees and fee schedules: counties have different fee schedules for the state fees. Lynn

recommended adding “…two bills, as well as take steps at the local level that will reduce the

impact of court fees on low income individuals,…” Susan Silver asked if any county was doing

this correctly; Esther responded no. The group discussed how to address Champaign’s ability to

reduce its fee structure.

Subsection on Housing

Esther presented the subsection on housing, particularly discrimination against felons in housing

policy. The group discussed the language of the recommendations. Esther explained the Circuit

Clerk fee attachment.

Subsection on Structural Issues

Amy Felty discussed the changes she made to the structural section. Amy then walked through

the structure and the sections of her report. Esther asked about School Resource Officers. Esther

also asked how the report could be narrowed down. Carolyn suggested creating some of this as

supplemental reading. She recommended a recommendation, how you collected data and

highlights from findings, and then recommendations. She recommended pulling some things

from her section into the introduction of the full report. Sara suggested trying to determine how

to fit most of it in as “supplemental reading”. Sara likes the idea of pulling highlights and more

relevant recommendations together for the report. Amy asked for help to edit the report down.

Lynn mentioned how difficult the task of the group is and mentioned a concern about the original

role of the task force to study the criminal justice system. The group discussed the Structural

section and how it fits into the work of the task force and how it could fit into the final report.

VIII. New Business

There was no new business.

IX. Subcommittee Meetings

There were no subcommittee meetings.

X. Adjournment

Artice moved to adjourn.

http://www.co.champaign.il.us/CountyBoard/RJTF/2017/170629_Meeting/170629Minutes.pdf