The HOME funding would fund actual specific units at the development, right now based on per unit maximum subsidies. | File photo
The HOME funding would fund actual specific units at the development, right now based on per unit maximum subsidies. | File photo
The city of Urbana Community Development Commission met May 24 to approve a subrecipient agreement between the Urbana HOME Consortium and Highland Green, LLC.
Here are the meeting's minutes, as provided by the commission:
UNAPPROVED
MINUTES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, May 24, 2016, City Council Chambers
400 South Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61801
Call to Order: Chairperson Cobb called the regular meeting to order at 7:02pm.
Roll Call: Kelly H. Mierkowski called the roll. A quorum was present.
Commission Members Present: Fred Cobb, Brian Cunningham, Chris Diana, Anne Heinze Silvis,
and Lauren Karplus
Commission Members Excused/Absent: Janice Bengtson and Jerry Moreland
Others Present: Kelly H. Mierkowski and Matt Rejc, Community Development Services.
Approval of Minutes: Chairperson Cobb asked for approval or corrections to the April 26, 2016
minutes. Commissioner Cunningham moved to approve the minutes as written and Commissioner
Karplus seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Petitions and Communications: Chairperson Cobb asked if there was any written communication
to the Commission; there were none.
Audience Participation: Chairperson Cobb stated that audience members could speak if they so
wished, no one from the audience stepped forward to speak.
Staff Report: Kelly H. Mierkowski, Grants Management Division Manager, provided a brief overview
of the staff report provided to the Commissioners that evening, which included HUD activities, staff
activities, meetings attended, and various projects and programs.
Old Business: None
New Business:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE URBANA
HOME CONSORTIUM AND HIGHLAND GREEN, LLC.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
URBANA AND HIGHLAND GREEN, LLC.
Ms. Mierkowski stated Mr. Rejc would start the presentation and then questions would be answered as
they arise. The first resolution is for the Urbana HOME Consortium to transfer funds to Highland Green,
LLC, the development consortium that is trying to build what was known as the Kerr Avenue
Sustainability Development and is now known as Highland Green. This resolution goes hand in hand
with the second resolution which conveys Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. For
purposes of logistics, it is two separate agreements, one between the Urbana HOME Consortium and the
developer, and one between the City of Urbana and the developer. The City of Urbana agreement would
2
convey CDBG funds and the other agreement would convey HOME funds. The two agreements
combined total $500,000 being given to the developer for various uses: $291,000 in terms of HOME
funds and the remainder (about $200,000) in CDBG funds. This was done to fill the financial gaps that
the developer had for this project. Most of the funding is provided by the Low Income Housing Tax
Credits (LIHTC) through the Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA) and the other gap
financing, but their pro forma is tight so this funding is crucial to allow this development to meet the
City’s goals that have been set for this development for the past several years. This is a very important
contribution from the City of Urbana and Urbana HOME Consortium.
The HOME funding would fund actual specific units at the development, right now based on per unit
maximum subsidies, there would be two units that would be subject to HOME rent restrictions and a 20
year affordability period and other restrictions per HOME regulations. The CDBG funding is only
allowed to be used for infrastructure, it cannot be used for new construction of housing units, but the site
plans show construction of new roads, new sewage facilities, pipes; the developer has estimated about
$1 million worth of infrastructure work that the CDBG funds will assist with the work that can be done.
As mentioned before, this project has been voiced through many City documents and Council has
repeated its support of this project; it is listed in the previous and current City of Urbana and Urbana
HOME Consortium Consolidated Plans, is included in the Council and Mayor Goals for the City. The
2005 City of Urbana Comprehensive Plan, although more of a land use document, many of the goals
stated in that document would be met through this development. A very important benefit of the HOME
funds being contributed to this project is that it is a very large component of meeting our HOME
commitment deadline. It is about $500,000 in HOME funds that the Consortium as a whole, made up of
the City of Urbana, City of Champaign and Champaign County (CCRPC), needs to be able to make.
There is a plan in place to commit the total amount by the deadline, but this is a critical component of
the plan by committing these funds to Highland Green. Programmatically, this project is in keeping with
many of the guiding documents of the City of Urbana and Urbana HOME Consortium. Staff
recommends that the Community Development Commission forward these resolutions advancing these
funds to the developer to the Urbana City Council with a recommendation for approval. Mr. Rejc than
asked if there were any questions from the Commissioners.
Chairperson Cobb commented about the agreement to provide $500,000 in total and that the request was
for $450,000. An extra $50,000 was given to the developer, plus the most recent pro forma reveals that
there is an unmet need and insufficient contingency. What is the unmet need? Mr. Rejc explained that
with their sources right now, i.e. the funding they have, they do not have much to fall back on even
though their financial needs are being met. If any of the costs increase, if the estimates were off, etc.,
they do not have a contingency to fall back on. Staff thought it would be appropriate to provide them
with more funds to give them more of a financial cushion in case costs increase.
Commissioner Cunningham stated that the development started as the Kerr Avenue Sustainability
Development, and now it is Highland Green. What is the timeframe for completion? Mr. Rejc
responded in that part of the restrictions for using HOME funds is that construction needs to begin
within 12 months. So in order to commit HOME funds to this project, we have to have a confidence that
it will begin construction within the 12 months. They hope to close on all their financing relatively soon
and after that we would estimate it to be within 9-12 months that they would begin construction. We
understand that it has been a long time coming, but we are as close as we have ever been to the project
beginning.
3
Ms. Mierkowski also stated that part of the time delay was waiting for the developer to receive Low
Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) from the Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA), in
that the developer applied over several years to receive the tax credits, as developers really need the tax
credits in order to make the project more affordable to build. It took several years for IHDA to free up
the tax credits, as there were a lot of new developments in the community that had received the tax
credits which have now been built. The developers were able to receive the tax credits this past spring,
which is why we are moving quickly on this project.
Commissioner Silvis asked if there was anything on the lot, and Mr. Rejc stated there are no structures
on the property. The lots are adjacent to Crystal View Townhomes, Crystal View Townhomes on the
west and Barr Avenue to the south, Cunningham Motors to the east. Ms. Mierkowski stated that Crystal
View Townhomes were more southwest of the properties. The plan by the developer is to include
amenities from Crystal View Townhomes for the Highland Green project.
Commissioner Diana followed up on an earlier comment with regard to the unmet needs. The unmet
need was the lack of contingency funds and Mr. Rejc agreed. Commissioner Diana stated that roughly
40% is CDBG and 60% is HOME; depending upon how this project rolls out, what we were using as the
identification of the use for CDBG funds, with the physical infrastructure development, is all of that
compliant with the normal use of funds? Normally when we talk about infrastructure, we do not talk
about physical infrastructure with CDBG funds. Ms. Mierkowski responded in that in our Annual Action
Plan we will list City Infrastructure as an eligible activity, we have work with our Public Works Dept. to
do sidewalks, gutters, sewers, etc., so doing physical infrastructure is an eligible activity for CDBG.
Commissioner Diana followed up with another question asking how staff was going to keep track of the
funds, i.e. determine that funds allocated are being used for its intended purpose. The agreements are
receiving legal review to make sure they are legally sufficient; that information can be included in the
agreements. We can also talk to the developers regarding what specifically needs to be done and then tag
certain infrastructure activities in the agreement. Ms. Mierkowski stated that we definitely monitor the
activity onsite and will meet with the developer to make sure that the funds are used for their purpose,
same as for Crystal View Townhomes and any other project that we allocate funding to.
Commissioner Diana also asked about their funding, wondering how far along they were with their
financial piece. Mr. Rejc stated that they have their commitment for the tax credits, which is the biggest
portion, along with the other parts that are also committed. We will be getting in touch with the
developer to confirm their status with regard to their financing.
Chairperson Cobb wanted clarification regarding the total amount needed for the project at $7 million
and Mr. Rejc confirmed that it is $7.6 million. Also noted was the fiscal impact of the project, the memo
states there will be no fiscal impact on the City general funds. What impact does it have on community
development grant funds, i.e. CDBG and HOME? Ms. Mierkowski stated that we have a unique
situation, in that we have found older carryover funds from FY 1314 and FY 1415, from when program
income was used on projects instead of grant funds, which has to be used first before grant funds. This
then freed up grant funds, which were not spent. These funds were found by our new Grants Compliance
Specialist, Don Ho and Matt, who did a thorough search of our budget and IDIS through reports. It will
not affect any current or past project that we have not completed, nor will it affect FY 1516 funds or FY
1617 funds for projects.
4
Commissioner Silvis asked if the structures would look similar to Crystal View Townhomes site and Mr.
Rejc stated that because it is the same developer as Crystal View Townhomes, presumably it will have a
similar look to those units. However, Crystal View Townhomes are attached townhomes, and these will
be entirely single family duplex units. It will be much smaller and more spread out, looking more like a
single family neighborhood, but it will be all under one ownership it will be rental. The physical
characteristics of the units themselves are still being determined, as the development needs to undergo a
planned unit development (PUD) analysis, which will play a role in what they are allowed to do in terms
of creating the unit and designing them. Ms. Mierkowski also commented that the same architect may
be used for this development as was used for Crystal View Townhomes and other developments.
Chairperson Cobb also asked about the public hearing scheduled for June 9th, and Mr. Rejc stated that it
will be held at the Plan Commission meeting, for the planned unit development (PUD) that was
mentioned earlier. The Plan Commission is an advisory body similar to the Community Development
Commission and is open to the public. The Planning Division staff will be sending out the notice of this
public hearing, people within 250 feet of the subject property will receive the mailing. Signs will also be
placed on the property stating that this property will be the subject of a planned unit development
(PUD), with the date, time, and location of the hearing on the sign. Ms. Mierkowski stated that this
project is being worked on together with the Planning Division.
Commissioner Diana followed up with another question, with regard to the timing of the project,
considering the PUD, etc. Mr. Rejc stated that the project has to begin construction within 12 months,
whether it is the infrastructure or units themselves, but we will double check the regulations to make
sure.
Chairperson Cobb entertained a motion to either forward the Resolutions to Council with a
recommendation for approval, forward the resolutions with to Council with a recommendation for
approval with changes, or to not forward for approval. Commissioner Cunningham motioned for
approval of the Resolution, Commissioner Diana seconded the motion; the motion carried.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING AN URBANA HOME CONSORTIUM TENANT BASED
RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AGREEMENT (Community Elements TBRA FY 2012-
2013)
Mr. Rejc began by stating that there originally was an agreement signed with Community Elements
several years ago, and it dedicated HOME funds from FY 2012-2013. The expenditures for Community
Elements for these funds have slowed down over the past few months and the agreement expires June
30, 2016. Because of these reasons and the continued need for this assistance, Community Elements was
contacted and since it is within HOME regulations to have a four year expenditure period and the
agreement was signed in 2013, we would like to extend this agreement for another year to make the
expiration of this agreement June 30, 2017. This will give them more time to spend the funds. They do
have another agreement following this one for $32,000 with the same deadline for expiration, so we
would work with them to make sure they spend these funds and making sure that assistance is provided
to people who need it. In the short term, we think it would be best to extend this agreement to give them
another year to use the funds. Their program is in line with many of the goals in the Consolidated Plan.
Staff recommends that Community Development Commission forward this resolution to City Council
with a recommendation for approval. Mr. Rejc then asked if there were any questions.
5
Commissioner Karplus asked if staff are in contact with Community Elements, why are they having
trouble spending the funds? Do people not need the assistance, or is it too bureaucratic? Ms. Mierkowski
stated that one possibility is that the agency has new staff that is unaware of this program. We will be
addressing this issue when we monitor the agency for this particular program. Mr. Rejc agreed that staff
would be in contact with Community Elements regarding this program and that monitoring will help us
get an in depth look at the program, organization structure, and how it is run. Recommendations can also
be made to them regarding how to improve the program and spend the funds more quickly and bring in
clients. Commissioner Diana indicated he would recommend it rather strongly that we talk to them about
spending the funds, as there is no shortage of rental assistance required in the community, and that it is
fine what we are doing here, but the purpose of these funds initially were not to be sure that they are
expended so that do not have to go back to HUD, was to expend them as needed. Obviously there is
more need there and it is not really being met, so I would be happier if they had run out of funds earlier
and were asking for more, rather than it was forgotten in a drawer in the back room.
Chairperson Cobb entertained a motion to either approve the Resolution, approve with suggested
changes, or to not approve. Commissioner Silvis motioned for approval of the Resolution,
Commissioner Cunningham seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Study Session: No items for this agenda.
Adjournment: Seeing no further business, Chairperson Cobb adjourned the meeting at 7:38 p.m.
Recorded by
Kelly H. Mierkowski
Manager, Grants Management Division
UNAPPROVED