Quantcast

Chambana Sun

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Which Greater C-U school districts benefit most from state pension subsidies?

Webp hs 07

Armstrong-Ellis Cons SD 61 in Armstrong receives $978 per student from the state to fund pensions for public school teachers and administrators – the most in Greater C-U, according to a Wirepoints analysis of Teacher Retirement System data.

At the bottom, Oakwood CUSD 76 in Oakwood receives $332 per student.

Wirepoints examined the system in which school districts pay salaries to teachers and administrators, but not pensions, which are funded by state tax dollars.

"It’s a scheme that allows districts to spend more money on salaries and perks than they otherwise would," Wirepoints reported. "Wealthy districts – like those on the North Shore – benefit far more from the state’s pension payments than poor districts do."

Almost 50 percent of what the state pays toward education has gone to teacher pensions in recent years, according to Wirepoints. Bigger pensions in wealthy districts means there’s less money to adequately fund districts with less property wealth.

Armstrong-Ellis Cons SD 61, which relies on the state for 8 percent of its revenue and spends $18,859 per student, ranks 22 out of 848 districts for how much the state provides per student toward pensions.

Oakwood CUSD 76 relies on the state for 46 percent of its revenue and spends $8,851 per student. It ranks 825th in the state.

The analysis shows Rondout SD 72 in Lake County received the biggest subsidy in the state and Earlville CUSD 9 in LaSalle County received the smallest subsidy.

--

Greater C-U school districts receiving state-provided pension subsidies

DistrictCountyCityAverage daily attendancePercent of district revenue provided by the stateEAV (taxable property) per studentDistrict spending per student  State-provided pension subsidy per student* 
Armstrong-Ellis Cons SD 61VermilionArmstrong648%$632,841$18,859$978
Armstrong Twp HSD 225VermilionArmstrong1263%$460,386$13,344$675
Urbana SD 116ChampaignUrbana3,84321%$159,071$13,835$609
Champaign

 CUSD 4

ChampaignChampaign8,77213%$219,596$13,478$601
Rantoul Township HSD 193ChampaignRantoul66635%$259,950$12,694$587
Thomasboro CCSD 130ChampaignThomasboro14537%$169,990$10,709$527
Deland-Weldon CUSD 57PiattDeLand20210%$290,393$13,022$527
Gibson City-Melvin-Sibley CUSD 5FordGibson City97923%$121,607$10,414$516
Rantoul City SD 137ChampaignRantoul1,49952%$65,476$11,758$515
Ludlow CCSD 142ChampaignLudlow7335%$207,396$12,239$514
Bement CUSD 5PiattBement29615%$201,229$10,694$507
Monticello CUSD 25PiattMonticello1,4857%$152,561$9,573$477
Danville CCSD 118VermilionDanville5,26552%$61,375$11,705$467
Hoopeston Area CUSD 11VermilionHoopeston1,15755%$54,691$10,987$461
Paxton-Buckley-Loda CUD 10FordPaxton1,28331%$120,858$10,305$450
Prairieview-Ogden CCSD 197ChampaignRoyal2398%$300,208$9,968$447
Mahomet-Seymour CUSD 3ChampaignMahomet2,79433%$104,191$9,102$433
Heritage CUSD 8ChampaignHomer43412%$188,780$11,531$432
Fisher CUSD 1ChampaignFisher59022%$116,166$10,328$429
Cerro Gordo

CUSD 100

PiattCerro Gordo50027%$139,353$8,667$427
St Joseph Ogden CHSD 305ChampaignSt Joseph44617%$406,509$9,800$424
Tolono CUSD 7ChampaignTolono1,57834%$115,490$8,979$423
Salt Fork CUSD 512VermilionCatlin84035%$114,961$9,106$416
Bismarck Henning CUSDVermilionBismarck75135%$99,522$9,511$411
Gifford CCSD 188ChampaignGifford19717%$197,981$8,832$403
Georgetown-Ridge Farm CUD 4VermilionGeorgetown91653%$68,071$9,523$394
Rossville-Alvin CUSD 7VermilionRossville26145%$115,920$8,614$393
Potomac CUSD 10VermilionPotomac16246%$87,019$8,513$378
St Joseph CCSD 169ChampaignSt Joseph87035%$140,616$7,886$360
Westville CUSD 2VermilionWestville1,19166%$37,392$8,532$352
Oakwood CUSD 76VermilionOakwood92246%$80,911$8,851$332
Source: Source: Illinois State Board of Education, ILEARN data 2016; Total earnings data received from a 2018 FOIA request to the Teachers' Retirement System; TRS actuarial report 2017; Wirepoints calculations

*Proxy of the pension subsidy provided to each school district. District subsidy is calculated by taking the TRS employer normal cost in 2017 ($871 million) and multiplying it by each district's share of TRS total employee earnings. To calculate the subsidy per student, each district's share is divided by their average daily attendance.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS